This week, I had the opportunity to take a different approach
to the "Problem of the Week." Connie and I, worked together to provide
our classmates with a problem in Free Discovery.
Free Discovery is a process a child goes through
when given a problem, but no instructions on how or what to do with that
problem. For example, we gave our classmates 6 bags of materials,
one per group. Each bag was similar in some ways, but differed slightly.
We explained to the groups to work with their materials and see what they
could do with them. We provided no instruction and no help.
We expected each group to explain to us what they observed about their
materials, based on what they discovered on their own!
As far as our presentation, I feel it went well.
I think Connie and I worked nicely together, and I like the fact we took a
different approach to teaching our lesson. I feel our classmates benefitted
more from actually witnessing first hand how a child processes discovery,
rather than struggling for the correct answer to an assigned problem.
Personally, I view my role in teaching this
lesson was performed fairly well. I spoke loudly and clearly when
introducing our lesson. I also feel I introduced the lesson in such
a way the students could understand, and I was surprised nobody asked for
specific instructions, like I thought they would!
I also liked the way I encouraged one group,
who was starting to give up. I did not tell them the answer, but
I told them they were on the right track. This led the group to continue
to think about their materials, and based on discoveries other groups had
made, they were able to draw conclusions on why their materials did not
work, and why their materials differed.
As for things I would do differently about teaching
the lesson, I did notice a few. After viewing the video, I noticed
that I made little eye contact when introducing the lesson. I relied
on reading my cards too much, and when I did look up, I noticed I had no
enthusiastic facial expressions. I am not sure why this happened,
I am not usually like this. All I can think of is that I was slightly
intimidated by my peers, but I am not sure.
Another thing I noticed I needed to improve
was walking around the room. When I was walking I merely observed,
asking only a few questions. If I were to do this again, I would
walk around each group and ask what they had noticed thus far, how they
discovered what they had discovered, and if there was anything else they
could do with their materials. I would not give them instruction,
just reinforce their motivation to continue discovering.
The final thing I think I could have improved
was the way I ended the lesson. I know it is difficult to teach with
another person, even if you plan out what to say you both end up saying
things as they come to you. I feel this happened with the conclusion,
and I was left just ending it sort of choppy. When we planned out
our lesson, the conclusion sounded better. I think, I fi were to
do this again, I would ask more questions at the end. I would reinforce
and possibly question what each group had discovered. I also think
the fact we only had limited time may have put a little added pressure
on me, and perhaps that si why I just ended the lesson like I did.
All in all, I feel our lesson was a success.
I wish I had asked more questions about how they used the discovery process,
and how they could relate that to the way children discover, but I know
that for next time. I feel, we had a strong lesson and the students
benefitted from it greatly, as did we!