Frequently Asked Questions
(Adapted from the Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.)
Q. Doesn’t sexual harassment have to involve
sexual advances or other conduct sexual in nature?
A. No. The 1980 EEOC Guidelines on Sexual
Harassment do suggest that conduct constituting sexual
harassment must be “conduct of a sexual nature,” but it
is just as unlawful to harass people with gender-based
conduct of a nonsexual nature. Consider, for example, a
man and a woman each holding the same kind of job in an
organization. If their supervisor gives demeaning and
inappropriate assignments (such as serving coffee,
picking up dry cleaning, emptying a wastebasket) to the
woman, but not to the man, because of the woman’s
gender, that conduct, if sufficiently severe or
pervasive, could amount to harassment on the basis of
sex even though the assignments are not sexual in
nature. The key question here is not whether the
unwelcome conduct was sexual in nature but whether it
was based on the victim’s gender.
Q. Isn’t sexual harassment limited to situations
where supervisors make sexual demands on subordinates?
A. No. Sexual power plays by supervisors
constitute the most easily understood form of sexual
harassment. But harassment also occurs when
supervisors, co-workers, or even nonemployees create a
hostile environment through unwelcome sexual advances or
demeaning gender-based conduct. There have even been
cases where a subordinate has sexually harassed a
supervisor.
Regarding harassment by non employees
(clients, customers, vendors, consultants, independent
contractors, and the like), the College’s ability to
police unwelcome conduct may be more limited than with
employees. For example, it is easier to investigate and
discipline an employee than a customer. The College
still, however, must take reasonable steps to address
the situation once the matter comes to its attention.
Q. Can harassment occur without physical
touching or a threat to the employee's job?
A. Yes. The nature of harassment may be purely
verbal or visual (pornographic photos or graffiti on
workplace walls, for example), and it does not have to
involve any job loss. Any conduct based on a
protected status that creates a work environment that a
reasonable person would consider hostile may amount to
harassment.
Q.
Isn’t there a right to free speech?
A. The First Amendment protects some forms of
expression, even in the workplace, but the verbal
threats and name calling often involved in harassment
are not protected as free speech. For example, the
First Amendment would not protect, as free speech, a
supervisor’s threat to a subordinate that she will lose
her job if she does not sleep with her boss. Nor will
the First Amendment protect verbal conduct that offends
and intimidates other employees to the point that their
work is affected, creating a hostile environment.
Q.
Is sexual harassment of men, either by women or by other
men, unlawful?
A. Yes. Although sexual harassment generally is
perpetrated by men against women, any form of unwelcome
sexual advance against employees of either gender may be
the basis for a case of unlawful sexual harassment.
Q.
What about harassment of employees by clients or
customers or vendors?
A. The College has a duty to take reasonable
steps to protect employees from discriminatory
harassment inflicted by third parties, such as vendors.
The College does not have the same power to influence
vendors that the College has to influence employees, but
must take whatever reasonable steps it can to prevent
and correct harassment inflicted on employees by third
parties.
Q. I’m so mad at the person who harassed me and
at my employer that I just want to sue. Should I even
bother to complain under the College’s antiharassment
policy?
A. Yes. You owe it to the College and to your
co-workers to report through the institution’s channels
to give the College a chance to solve the problem
promptly, before others are affected.